Skip to content
SetupArc

Monitors · Head-to-head

Gigabyte M28U vs Dell S2725QC

Two 4K monitors for a desk that has to do both jobs — a 28-inch 144 Hz panel with a KVM, against a 27-inch 120 Hz screen with USB-C charging and speakers.

Gigabyte M28UHigher Refresh
8.5Score
$400–$500
VS
Dell S2725QCBetter Value
8.4Score
$280

Quick verdict

Choose the Gigabyte M28U if…

Choose the Gigabyte M28U if the same 4K screen also has to game — 144 Hz on an SS-IPS panel with 1 ms response, DisplayHDR 400 and a USB-C KVM.

Choose the Dell S2725QC if…

Choose the Dell S2725QC if a laptop is the main source — its USB-C carries 65 W charging, it has 2 × 5 W speakers, and its reference price starts lower.

What you'll actually notice

The differences that change which one you should buy, rather than every difference there is.

  • Refresh rate

    The Gigabyte M28U runs at 144 Hz against 120 Hz. That gap shows up in fast-paced games where the frame rate can actually reach it, and is essentially invisible for desktop work, browsing and video.

  • KVM switch

    Only the Gigabyte M28U has a KVM switch, so one keyboard and mouse can move between two connected machines without unplugging anything. That is a two-computer desk feature; on a single-machine desk it changes nothing.

  • HDR

    The Gigabyte M28U carries the stronger HDR certification (VESA DisplayHDR 400 against HDR10). That shows up in HDR games and film, not in ordinary SDR desktop use.

  • Speakers

    Only the Dell S2725QC has built-in speakers (2 × 5W), which saves a cable on a simple desk and will not replace dedicated audio.

What the price difference means

The Gigabyte M28U sits about $150 more by reference price ($400–$500 against $280–$350 for the Dell S2725QC). That premium is buying specific capabilities rather than a generally better product.

Reference prices are our own editorial figures for a typical street price, not live retailer quotes.

Paying more for the Gigabyte M28U buys

  • Refresh rate
  • KVM switch
  • HDR

What it does not buy

  • Speakers — the Dell S2725QC leads here
  • a decisive lead in the SetupArc Score (8.5 against 8.4)

Key differences

The specifications that meaningfully differ between the two. A highlighted value is the stronger figure where it can be compared objectively.

SpecificationGigabyte M28UDell S2725QC
Screen Size28"27"
Panel TypeSS-IPSIPS
Color Coverage94% DCI-P399% sRGB
Brightness300 nits (400 peak)—
HDRVESA DisplayHDR 400HDR10
Refresh Rate144 Hz120 Hz
Response Time1 ms (GtG)4 ms (fast)
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro / G-Sync CompatibleAMD FreeSync Premium

Full side-by-side specs

SpecificationGigabyte M28UDell S2725QC
Screen Size28"27"
Resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Refresh Rate144 Hz120 Hz
Panel TypeSS-IPSIPS
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Response Time1 ms (GtG)4 ms (fast)
Brightness300 nits (400 peak)—
HDRVESA DisplayHDR 400HDR10
Color Coverage94% DCI-P399% sRGB
USB-CYes (DP Alt)Yes (DP Alt, 65W)
ThunderboltNoNo
HDMI2 × HDMI 2.12 × HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort1 × DP 1.4No
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro / G-Sync CompatibleAMD FreeSync Premium
KVM SwitchYes (Type-C)—
VESA Mount100 × 100100 × 100
SpeakersNo2 × 5W
Height AdjustableYesYes
USB-C Power Delivery—65 W

Who should buy each one

Gigabyte M28U

Buyers who want affordable 4K/144Hz for gaming, consoles and creative work with USB-C convenience.

GamingCreative WorkProductivity
  • DisplayHDR 400 (no strong local dimming)
  • USB-C power delivery limited

Dell S2725QC

Value-focused buyers who want a crisp 4K screen with single-cable USB-C charging for a laptop.

ProductivityGeneral UseMac compatibility
  • No Ethernet, KVM or DisplayPort input
  • 65W may not fully power large laptops

Final verdict

There is no single winner here — the right choice depends on what you need.

8.5Score
Gigabyte M28U
Higher Refresh

Better for 4K gaming and consoles.

Read the full Gigabyte M28U review
8.4Score
Dell S2725QC
Better Value

Better for a single-cable laptop desk.

Read the full Dell S2725QC review

At 8.5 and 8.4, these scores are too close to decide anything on their own. Use the trade-offs above instead — how we score.

Keep exploring

Want to line these up against other options, or get a tailored recommendation?